Pat Robertson, Christian Leadership, and Big Voices
(photo- AP)In the wake of Pat Robertson's suggestion that the United States actively assasinate a head of state, the political fallout is heavy. But really who cares? The more pressing concern relates to Robertson's connection to the Church. For whatever reason, some church provided him with the little "Rev." title before his name and now he is labeled a Christian, Evangelical, Fundamental minister. Thus, for the rest of the world at least, he is the spokesman, along with Jerry Falwell, of all who fall into, or close to, that category. But do these powerful broadcasters really speak for conservative Christianity? Sadly, the answer is often yes. By that I mean they have a lot of support from Chrisitans who are not thinking on their own, and they are content to follow a trusted and successful leader. A few suggestions.
1) Conservative Christianity needs more people speaking out (with gentleness and love) on issues from the biblical standpoint (in stark opposition to most of what Robertson says). For example, Al Mohler's work on Larry King Live has had considerable influence in painting a more accurate picture of conservative Christianity. If you have a platform at all, whether a pulpit, blog, or a talk with a neighbor on the porch, do everything in your power to demonstrate that conservative Christianity is not Robertson-styled terrorism.
2) The church in America should hold Robertson accountable for his words. The news broadcasters have been discussing how Robertson might be punished for his words and they come up empty, because his network is cable and largely untouchable by the FCC. Plus, he is a "private citizen" with an opinion. But the church does exercise discipline over its membership and does have the power to hold them accountable for their words and actions. Particularly, I call on the local church where Pat Robertson is a member to consider asking Robertson to reconsider his views on murder and the law and to keep his controversial opinions to himself.
3) The gospel of Jesus Christ is the ultimate answer to this problem. Conservative Christians must embrace more deeply and share more readily and steadily the truth that makes us what we are. The cross of Christ points us to remember our complete and utter sinfulness (we are worse than Chavez before a holy Lord) and the complete washing away of sins through the work of Jesus. He has made peace through His cross (Romans 5:1). The gospel is the only hope for humanity, but instead of promoting it as we should, conservative Christians are more often caught in the political wranglings with the rest of the world. Let us focus first on what matters eternally and then we will make a real difference in our culture.





4 Comments:
Mmhmm, before I make my comment, let me direct the blog owner towards their Blogger settings under Comments. Turn Word Verification ON before you're overrun with spamvertisements. ;-)
Now then. It is my opinion, based off of my own interpretation, that our position as "sinners" is not to demean who and what we are. All of us being "sinners" is boiled down to this old cliche: Nobody's perfect (except one, of course). We can't fall into a realm of self-loathing because we are sinners. I'm not saying you've implied this here, but I have seen it in a lot of churches I've been to. Remember Jesus's statement about God's greatest commandment, and I refer to part number 2: "...and love your neighbor as you WOULD LOVE YOURSELF." It's amazing the multitude of sins we DO commit because we do not love one or more of the following:
1. God.
2. Our neighbor(s).
3. Ourselves.
How can we truly love others if we cannot love ourselves, anyway?
Uh, okay, a little bit of a preachy response to us being worse than Chavez before a holy Lord. Short answer: we are no better or worse than Chavez before God. We are equal. We are all Jesus's brothers, sisters and mothers.
And in that, I do agree that Mr. Robertson went WAY out of line. Quite disgusting actually.
Thanks for the tip on our spam friends. Thanks also for the "preachy" note to which I say Amen. We must love ourselves if we are going to come to Christ, because after all that is the best thing we can do for ourselves. I would note however that Paul referred to himself as the "chief of sinners." Not that he loathed himself, but understood the depths of his rebellion (and ours) against God.
All the more reason to run to the cross for the grace of Christ.
Just discovered your website. I like it. Thanks for calling for some accountability among well-known Christians like Pat Robertson. Like the rest of us, the man isn't perfect but why in the world would he make such a comment? God bless him but is he losing it? If so, I pray that his Christian friends and advisors counsel him in love. As for Chavez, I agree with "Xanadian" that we are no worse sinners than he; or, at the least, we don't know if we are worse.
This is from Jason Dollars comment. "we must love ourselves if we are to come to Christ......" Yes we must love ourselves,but how can we love ourselves if we haven't recieved Christ?We cannot love ourselves until we come to Christ.He shows us how to love.It is not, first you love yourself,then come to Christ,and so on.Just be careful how you word things,because this may give people the wrong impression,and they are left thinking that they must take care of everthing themselves.Jesus does it all,and He shows us how to love ourselves,and others and most importantly,Him.We don't know how to love ourselves,and that is another reason why we need Him.
Post a Comment
<< Home