Worldviews
The Newsletter of the Apologetics Resource Center
February/March 2005
A Decision Made!
In our January edition of Worldviews, I asked for feedback from you, our readers,
concerning the format and style of our Worldviews newsletter. You may recall
that we’ve decided to send it out monthly instead of bi-monthly (with
the exception of this bi-monthly issue).
My question or concern
was whether we needed to shorten the length (number of
pages from eight to four) and abbreviate
our articles, in order to enhance
the
chance of it actually being read. Our goal is to keep you educated and equipped
to carry out the normal Christian’s calling to be redemptively engaged
with people and ideas, enabling His Church to be salt and light—to be
in the world, but not of it—to not be conformed to the world but to be
transformed by the renewing of our minds.
The Results—It is a little worrisome
that not very many people responded. But of those who did, the result was about
50/50. Some said, “Keep it more
in depth—I read every word!” Others said “We like the idea
of streamlining and shortening—all the text is off-putting.” So,
I’ve decided to produce a “blended” newsletter. Some month’s
newsletter will contain four pages and some eight. But when we have the eight
page edition, the inside section will contain the more in-depth articles, while
the outer pages will be more tapered. OOPS!
In the January issue, we asked you to prayerfully consider helping ARC to 1)
function, and 2) expand in our mission. One way is to help us expand the
circulation of a valuable, strategic ministry vehicle—our bimonthly
Areopagus Journal. We continue to receive very positive feedback on the quality
of our journal from both academics and laypeople. But it needs to have many
more subscribers to just break even with our costs and to have a deeper and
wider impact in the Body of Christ.
So, to expand that aspect of our work,
we strongly encourage those of you who have not subscribed, to do so. It’s
only $25 per year for six issues, and the back issues are a real bargain
too! Stock up your own resource library
for your personal edification and growth and copy and give articles away to
people you encounter with questions or relevant issues. Go to our website,
www.apologeticsresctr.org, for a list of past and future topics/issues.
The other way to strategically expand is to advertise to a select group of
Christians. Last month we asked you to consider targeting a special donation
for one, two or a three full-page ad campaign in World magazine, and a copy
of that ad was supposed to be enclosed. However, the printer/mailer mistakenly
left it out. But now you see it. Thus far we have received $1,075 designated
to the ad, and the cost is $2,730.
If we get just 1% return, we will
triple our subscription readership! The other way to help us is to consider
a one-time
gift or to become a regular
donor
to ARC. Last year we realized a significant shortfall resulting in an inability
to expand and one staff member didn’t receive two month’s of
salary. So far, January and February have been encouraging with giving
up 29% from
last year.
We have two new interns, Jason
Dollar and Brandon Robbins, as well as two new contingent staff in the field,
Keith Gibson in Kansas City
and Vic
Minish in
Anniston-Oxford. We have another experienced and capable potential staff
member in Pennsylvania who is applying to become a contingent staff (which
means they
may begin ministry but full-time status is delayed until they raise their
support). The year 2005 holds much promise and we are exploring by faith
a larger office
facility possibly joining with other local apologetics specialists. But
we need you, the Body, to partner with us. The Church
1. We are called to engage the world, people, ideas, and institutions. Some
of that engagement was reflected in the Bush presidential win as many commentators
attributed the difference to the mobilization and interest of the “Christian
Right.”
Predictably, the political and
ideological left is gearing up with their rhetoric, publishing articles
in their magazines and with pieces
in the national media,
equating evangelical Christianity with the Taliban and Al Queda.
Let me go
on record with a solemn admonition that if we neglect personal
evangelism and solid discipleship, and if we don’t continue
to equip believers and leaders with a solid biblical worldview, then
our culture and
country will
inevitably slide into secularism and paganism.
Let’s wake up from
any illusions or delusions we have about the strength of the Church in
America. The vital, growing Church today is in Africa, South
America, South Korea, and even China. Church growth in America is stagnant.
Europe has been dead for quite a while. England is now 14% Muslim.
John
Piper noted in the recent World magazine (03/05/05) that Barna’s
latest research demonstrated that “having a biblical worldview
changes the way evangelicals live.” Only about 8% of Americans
fall into the category of “evangelical,” that is, believe
basic, fundamental propositions (Trinity, salvation by grace and faith
alone, inerrancy, etc).
Yet only 9% tithe, 26% do not believe premarital sex is wrong, and
80% of Christian teenagers who took a chastity pledge had sex in the
following
seven years.
2. Time magazine’s February
7, 2005 cover story featured “The 25
Most Influential Evangelicals in America.” A closer look at
the list provided a sobering wake-up call as to the direction and
state
of the U.S.
Church.
Second in the list is Rick Warren
(after Billy Graham), leader of the Saddleback church network (40,000
churches) and author of
the
best-selling
(20 million
copies) The Purpose Drive Life. This choice is reflective of the
general state of the Church. Church growth (numbers) and pragmatism,
man-centered
values,
with a little bit of sound theology (mixed with a lot of misapplied
Scripture) rules the day.
But also on the list are the sensationalistic,
manipulative and heretical word-faith leaders—T.D. Jakes and
Joyce Meyer. Too many Christians are seduced by their powerful personalities
and their mixtures of heresy with occasionally
good applicational messages.
And lastly, Stephen Strang and Ted Haggard are listed. Strang
is publisher of the popular series of charismatic magazines,
some
of which promoted
very controversial and shallow doctrines including a continuation
of prophets (mostly false ones) and apostles. Haggard is president
of
the National
Association
of Evangelicals. Yet he is very weak theologically and has promoted
the very controversial New Apostolic Reformation Movement led
by Peter Wagner
(more
on that momentarily).
3. The New Apostolic Reformation
Movement: Recent events locally prompted research and investigation
into
a fairly new church
growth/government phenomenon called
The New Apostolic Reformation Movement (NARM). The key figure
is C.
Peter Wagner, whose headquarters, the World Prayer Center cohabits
the property
of Ted Haggard’s
New Life Church in Colorado Springs.
The NARM has been gaining
widespread adherence particularly in the charismatic-Pentecostal
circles, especially in third
world
countries.
The basic premise of the
NARM is that the old paradigm of denominations and church
structures are stagnant
and that God is making a move to establish a new reformation
paradigm, promising to usher in a major revival leading to
Christ’s second coming.
Central in this new paradigm
is the reestablishment of the “5-Fold Ministry” taken
from Ephesians 4:11, 1 Corinthians 12:28 and Ephesians 2:20.
These passages seem to indicate that God’s original
and perpetual model (which was lost) for church growth and
vitality is the governmental structure of apostles, prophets,
evangelists, pastors, and teachers.
Wagner and company teach that we must all recognize and
submit to certain men who are believed to have that authority.
The
problem is, who determines
those
offices and what are the qualifications? On top of that,
the NARM leaders insist on the necessity of the power connection—i.e.
speaking in tongues. There are several other extreme spiritual
warfare practices which are part of this
movement as well.
The problem is that Wagner is
more interested in pragmatism than sound theology. The attempts made
to
justify their
paradigm are
weak and
wrong. Is there
a test of false prophets and apostles? Does the Bible
teach that the miraculous gifts have served their usefulness
and ceased?
The NARM teaches that prophets
can make false prophesies at first because they are processing how
to learn to
be a prophet.
Oh,
brother! A study
of the NARM
prophets reveals a long history of bizarre prophesies,
failed prophesies.
There is a considerable debate
among Christian scholars today over whether the supernatural “sign
gifts” (miracles, healing, prophesy, tongues)
have ceased (cessationists) or continue. That is
not to say that cessationists don’t believe that God still
performs healings and the miraculous. They just don’t believe
these are still gifts operating today. There is a lesser debate
whether
the offices and functions of apostles & prophets
are to be operative today. Most do not accept that
but those in the NARM do.
Yet, those “prophets” in
their lists have made many bizarre and false prophesies. And if these
are the same as the apostles and prophets of
the Bible, does that not mean we are to submit
to
whatever they say? Does that mean they can add to Scripture?
If they can’t add to Scripture, then
for what purpose do they function? I am in the
process of writing a thorough theological treatment of tongues, apostles,
prophets, and the place of doctrine
and experience—in response to the new phenomena.
4.
Evangelicals and Catholics Together (ECT): The
latest installment of ECT (now four documents)
has just been
released and included
in the evangelical
magazine, Christianity Today, and a Roman Catholic
publication, First Things (editor is Richard
John Neuhaus who is a
prominent drafter
in the ECT dialogues).
The focus of the document
is “A Call to Holiness.” It makes important
exhortations challenging narcissism, individualism,
and spiritual sloth in both communities. Yet we are sure to hear
strong oppositional responses from
more traditional Catholics and especially from
other Reformed theologians. For example, the introduction points
back to the Apostles’ Creed’s
affirmation of “Communion of the Saints,” utilizing
the Roman Catholic concept that “we are
in a certain, albeit imperfect communion with
one another in His body, the Church.”
Does
that mean certain individual Catholics and
Protestants or is it addressing how different
churches define
authentic conversion
in our
creeds? Catholicism
holds that we Protestants are members of
their Church, the true Church,
but “imperfectly
joined.” The latest document also states
that baptism, whether its seen as the sacrament
of “constitutive importance for Christian
existence [Catholicism], or a sign of expression
of a new Christian life already received” (many
Protestants—Reformed tradition of baptism
being a sign of the covenant replacing circumcision
is left out), is “the gateway to the
Christian life.” This casting of the
issue gives too much ground to Catholicism
as it favors their perspective.
But there is much to applaud in the document.
The only continuing problem is that these
Catholic theologians do not officially
represent or speak
for the
Vatican—the real authority of the Roman Catholic Church. Cults
1. Mormons & Jehovah’s Witnesses: As we pray for open doors to minister
to two of the largest, most accessible cults in America (Colossians 4:2-6),
we have been encouraged by a growing number of contacts from everyday Christians
who are beginning to intentionally meet with them. It has been a growing experience
for the Christians on a number of levels. Years ago we had over 30 individual
or families engaging Mormon missionaries almost weekly. This tied up the missionary
activity and provided a viable, informed witness to the Mormons. One missionary
(that we know) came to Christ during that time.
The
doctrines and practices of Jehovah’s
Witnesses not only bring eternal damnation
to its member but temporal pain as well.
Their organization is in
the news again over eleven new lawsuits in California contending that their
officials “covered up acts of child molestation.” The control
of the elders in a congregation, their rigid doctrine of the necessity of
two
witnesses, as well as the fear of any negative publicity, has repeatedly
caused this abuse in their history. Many deaths from lack of blood transfusions
have
plagued the cult as well.
The
squeaky-clean Mormon image façade
is becoming more and more transparent.
Not only is Utah (75% Mormon) higher
than the national average in divorce,
but the fundamentalist Mormon practice of polygamy is becoming a national
issue. State officials have for many years looked the other way regarding
enforcement
of laws against polygamy. But now the effects of abuse, and abuse of minors,
has surfaced the problem. Now the internal debate is escalating between
those who oppose polygamy and those who
endorse it.
After
all, polygamy is in their official doctrines
as an “everlasting
decree.” But now that sodomy, homosexual unions or marriage is
being debated in a culture that wants to hold “no absolutes,” the
legal status of monogamy is now being questioned and challenged by consistent
libertarians
and postmodernists. Polygamy is next
And
lastly, the daughter of one of Mormonism’s
most prominent religious scholars and
apologists has accused her father, Dr.
Hugh Nibley, of sexually
abusing her. The book Leaving the Saints: How I Lost the Mormons and
Found My Faith, was written by Dr. Martha Beck, a sociologist and therapist.
The
book is controversial as is Dr. Beck who is now divorced and living
as a homosexual.
2.
Caritas: the Catholic Medjugorje Mary
communal cult which was
set
up in Birmingham in 1988 by Terry Colafrancesco is in the news again.
The
Birmingham
Post-Herald reported that the plaintiffs (former residents) in the
lawsuit are in mediation discussions with the defendant. Colafrancesco
is charged
with abuse, money laundering, misuse of donations and extortion through
brainwashing.
3.
One of the many charges of heresy leveled
at the owners (host) and many guests
on Trinity
Broadcast Network is that they teach
self-absorbed,
self-centered,
hedonistic doctrines (Name- It-&-Claim-It, or Word Faith).
The founder/host, Paul Crouch has lost the court battle trying
to prevent
his accuser (of homosexual
relations) from publicly speaking about the incident(s). The accuser
was paid $425,000 in 1998 with a stipulation that he remain silent
about the affair.
In a disclosed deposition, Benny Hinn is said to have known about
it from Paul Crouch’s own admission. Yet he kept quiet and
played the godly Christian “leader” with
Crouch as a regular on TBN.
Now
Benny Hinn’s false claim
of healing and extravagant lifestyle has been revealed again on
a Dateline special aired this month. Stephen Strang,
publisher of Charisma and other charismatic- Pentecostal magazines
says Hinn is an anointed healer and a holy man of God. Hinn appeared
recently in Bangalore,
India for a “Healing Crusade”, but a panel followed
up on the professing “healed” and
announced that only Hinn’s Volunteers (team members) were
alleged to be healed. Letters
Dear ARC
I have decided to begin the process
of leaving our church due to some disturbing theology,
and I was looking for an
evangelical response to the "Jesus Seminar" and
Marcus Borg's teachings. I searched on Google, glanced through
a few of the websites, taking me to the article "The
Jesus Seminar: The Slippery Slope to Heresy." I immediately
recognized your name! I really appreciate this article and
the explanation of the dangers of the teachings of the "Jesus
Seminar". THANK YOU!
Valencia, CA
(top) |